seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Unfortunately, that wasn't genuine. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son advised his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two days later, and admitted to acquiring sexually molested the couple’s son several times.
In this landmark case, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment about the grounds of extenuating circumstances. The court acknowledged that when the crime of murder was founded, the offender experienced a history of mental illness, which played a significant role in committing the offense. This case established a precedent for thinking about mitigating factors during sentencing.
During the dynamic realm of legal statutes, amendments play a vital role in adapting to evolving circumstances and strengthening the legal framework. One such notable amendment that has garnered attention is the latest revision of Section 489-File of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC).
very long period petitioner was not viewed as for promotion, meeting on the departmental promotion committee and look at the petitioner (Promotion)
4. It goes without saying that observations made hereinabove are merely tentative in nature and strictly confined on the disposal of instantaneous bail petition.
ninety six . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually very well-settled that when looking at the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should look at the benefit of every one of the qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to such suitable candidates who will be found to generally be most meritorious among them. For the reason that petitioner was held being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was overlooked through the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy over the part of your respondent department.
whether while granting promotion senior employees were regarded as for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)
after release from the jail he missing interest to contest the instant appeal , appeal is dismissed (Criminal Jail Appeal )
Though lots of websites offer free case law, not all are equally reliable. It’s important To guage the credibility in the source before depending on the information.
When the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a chance to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only completed When the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence along with the petitioner company responded into the allegations as such they were very well aware about the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use being appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
ten. Without touching the merits with the case of your issue of yearly increases inside the pensionary emoluments on the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of your provincial government, these yearly increase, if permissible within the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment to be made from the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance because of funding issues and insufficient adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, necessitating the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
A reduce court might not rule against a binding precedent, although it feels that it is actually unjust; it might only express the hope that a higher court or even the legislature will reform the rule in question. In case the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and wishes to evade it and help the legislation evolve, it may both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts of the cases; some jurisdictions allow to get a judge to recommend that an appeal be carried out.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his check here therapy sessions. When they were instructed from the boy’s past, they asked if their children were Harmless with him in their home. The therapist assured them that they'd practically nothing to worry about.